-
I want to emphasize, from my professional point of view, the word interpretation audism and alleged that he wants to.
First of all I want to clarify that I am not against sign language at all, because I use it frequently.
am profoundly deaf since age two and a half due to streptomycin. I can seem hard of hearing because I speak like hearing people, but not really hear anything. While wearing braces
hearing aid I only intended to correct my own voice, to prevent the lift too much.
With the headset I hear sounds but I can not attend a conversation on his back. I have always to be watching the lips of the person who talks to me.
Throughout my life I have never been discriminated against or marginalized in any way. I have studied and studied a listener. I played professional football. He worked as a draftsman and surveyor designer first and later. Working as a journalist for a English newspaper "El Pueblo de Ceuta" taking a window view. My articles are widely read.
of opportunity in the national newspapers "What", in Barcelona, \u200b\u200band "Southern Journal" Malaga.
I have worked on numerous projects related to education of the deaf and my own experience I have noticed a total mess by some deaf people who try to impose an educational concept really wrong.
But now I will only refer to the concept of audism, as they want him to understand the drivers of that word.
I have read some references to discrimination and marginalization of the deaf on I will give my opinion openly or hypocrisy.
"A deaf person states that he worked at a company where all were listeners who spent the day talking and it worked.
One day his boss hired another person deaf and then the two spent the day with sign language while working. The boss caught their attention and then the deaf person was angry because he did not call attention to
listeners ... We'll see. I was a businessman making workshop in which all workers were deaf.
He spent time talking to each other and work is not progressed. I had to close the business and creating expelling all other business, the architecture, with hearing people.
The problem is that are necessary for working hands, mouth, and listeners can talk to work. The deaf do not. Deaf people need their hands to communicate and this forces them to work. No employer accepts that. "
THIS IS NOT AN EXCLUSION OR DISCRIMINATION.
"A deaf person was in high school, one day he played an interesting conference and requested an interpreter but could not be because he had not. Instead he was given roles in which he was writing what would be said in the conference ... If he had been warned before would not have gone to the conference ... "
wrong. Secondary School IS SUPPOSED TO know how to read AND IF YOU GAVE SOME CONFERENCE PAPERS WITH THE ALREADY HAD TO HAVE been satisfied (ELSE KNEW YOU DO NOT READ) SO
"... A deaf person gave him the schedule of courses integration in high school. He saw that his had more hours than normal and that prove to be support classes for the deaf. Their hearing peers did not have that kind of support and therefore did not accept the classes. He said that if he did not accept the kinds of support would rob the services of interpreters ... "
THE ANSWER IS LOGIC. IN AN INSTITUTE OR SCHOOL INTEGRATION IN A CAN NOT HAVE ALL KINDS OF HOURS TO GIVE SUPPORT (AS FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO LEARN ENGLISH OR FRENCH) AND CLASSES THAT WERE CREATED TO SUPPORT THE DEAF WITH INTERPRETERS. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE
IS YOUR PROBLEM AND YOU SOFTWARE YOU REMOVE THE PERFORMING SERVICE. ESO NO DISCRIMINATION OR EXCLUSION.
Another deaf person who explains his problem:
"... At a family gathering in which all listeners and I are the only deaf, is spend all their time talking and wondering what I say. Finally, I explain everything in a concise, short and this makes me mad. What do you think I am? ... "
I give the answer:
THE PROBLEM IS NOT IN THE LACK OF ATTENTION TOWARDS THE DEAF TO THE TIME TO EXPLAIN WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT IN THIS MEETING. THE PROBLEM IS THAT MANY WORDS DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE DEAF AND THE FAMILY AS THE WELL KNOWN ONLY GIVE SHORT ANSWERS TO RESUME ALL SPOKEN.
NOT UNDERSTAND, FOR EXAMPLE, ONE THAT WILL EXPLAIN THE FOLLOWING:
"My friend Rafa was looking for work and one day he met another friend who told him that the company may seek workers to their store and gave the address the company. The other day he came to meet him at the bar and the friend said he had not found work in the company had indicated they were already covered all the posts ... "
DEAF INTERPRETATION UNDERSTAND YOUR YES WE OFFER THE FAMILY AND THAT COULD BE THIS:
"A friend could not find work"
SUMMARY IS THE SAME BUT BUT TO THE EXTENT OF THE DEAF PERSON.
Those deaf people who have not studied, not read correctly, that unknown words and their composition in phrases (thousands and thousands of words) must accept their limitations and not confuse it with discrimination.
There are many more reasons to refute each and every one of the complaints made by these people deaf ... but would be fully exhausted if exposed here. THERE DISCRIMINATION
. IF THERE IS LIMITED. -------------------------------
311 - MORE ENVELOPE THE WORD audism
I want to insist, from my professional point of view, in the word AUDISMO and the supposed interpretation that she is wanted to give.
Before anything wants to leave clear that am not against the Language of Signs, for anything, because myself frequently uses it.
I am deaf deep from both and a half years because of the streptomycin. I can seem hipoacúsico because I speak as people listeners, but in fact I don't hear absolutely anything.
Although it takes apparatus earphone, alone it is good me to correct my own voice, to avoid that he/she lifts it a lot.
With the earphone I hear sounds but I cannot assist a conversation turned. I must always be looking at the person's lips that he/she speaks to me.
Along my life I have never been discriminated against neither excluded in any concept. I have studied as a listener he studies. I have played professional soccer. I have worked as draftsman first planner and I eat harnessed later. I work as journalist in a English newspaper "El Pueblo de Ceuta" taking an opinion window. My articles are very read.
I collaborate occasionally in the newspapers of national edition "Qué", of Barcelona (Spain), and "Diario Sur" of Málaga (Spain).
I have worked in numerous projects related with the education of the deaf ones and for my own experience I have noticed a total mess on the part of some deaf ones that try to impose a really mistaken educational concept.
But now I will only refer to the concept of AUDISMO, just as they want to insinuate it the propellers of that word.
I have read some references to discrimination and deaf people's marginación on those that I will give my opinion without mufflers neither hypocrisies.
"A deaf person exposes that she was working in a company where all were listeners that the day passed speaking and her working.
One day their boss hired another deaf person and then both spent the day with the language of signs while they worked. The boss got them the attention and then that deaf person got angry because she didn't get the attention to the listeners…
We will see. I was manager of a making shop in which all the workers were deaf people.
The time passed speaking between them and the work it didn't advance. I had to close the business expelling all and creating another business, architecture east, with people listeners.
The problem is in that are necessary to work the hands, not the mouth, and the listeners can speak working. The deaf ones nr. The deaf ones need the hands to communicate and he/she puts under an obligation to leave the work. No manager accepts that."
THIS IS NOT A MARGINACIÓN NEITHER DISCRIMINATION.
"A deaf person was in the High school, one day she played an interesting conference and an interpreter requested but it could not be because there was not. On the other hand they gave him papers in those that it was written what would be said in the conference… If they had warned him before he/she would not have gone to the conference… "
NOT WELL FACT. IF HE/SHE STUDIED HIGH SCHOOL IT IS SUPPOSED THAT HE/SHE WOULD KNOW HOW TO READ AND IF THEY GAVE HIM SOME PAPERS WITH THE CONFERENCE ONE ALREADY HAD TO HAVE GIVEN FOR SATISFIED (ANOTHER THING IS THAT HE/SHE DIDN'T KNOW HOW TO READ) FOR THAT THAT NO EXIST DISCRIMINATION NEITHER MARGINACIÓN SOME.
"… To a deaf person they gave him the schedule of subjects in an integration institute. Vió that his had more hours of the normal thing and that resultaren to be support classes for deaf people. Their partners listeners didn't have that support type and for that reason it didn't accept the classes. They responded him that if it didn't accept the support classes they would remove him the service of interpreters… "
LOGICAL. IN AN INSTITUTE OR IN A SCHOOL OF INTEGRATION THEY CANNOT HAVE EVERY HOUR TO GIVE CLASSES OF SUPPORT (LIKE IT STOPS WHO WANT TO LEARN ENGLISH OR FRENCH) AND FOR THAT REASON THE CLASSES OF SUPPORT WERE CREATED FOR DEAF PEOPLE WITH INTERPRETERS.
IF IT DOESN'T ACCEPT THEM IT IS THEIR PROBLEM AND IT IS LOGICAL THAT THEY REMOVE HIM THE SERVICE OF INTERPRETERS. THAT IS NOT DISCRIMINATION NEITHER MARGINACIÓN.
"… In a family meeting, in which all are listeners and me the only one deaf, they spend the whole while speaking and me asking what they say. At the end, they explain to me everything in a summarized way and brief and this angers me. What are they believed that I am? … "
THE PROBLEM IS NOT IN THE LACK OF ATTENTION HE/SHE MADE DEAF PEOPLE A HOUR OF EXPLAINING WHAT ONE IS SPEAKING IN THIS MEETING. THE PROBLEM IS IN THAT MANY WORDS DEAF PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND THEM AND AS THE RELATIVES THEY KNOW IT THEY VERY ONLY GIVE HIM SHORT ANSWERS THAT IT SUMMARIZES ALL THAT SPOKEN.
HE/SHE WOULD NOT UNDERSTAND, FOR EXAMPLE THAT ONE EXPLAINED TO HIM THE FOLLOWING THING:
"My friend Rafa was looking for work and the other day he/she met with another friend that commented him that the SUCH company looked for workers for its warehouse and he/she gave him the address of the company. The other day he was it in the bar again and the friend commented him that he had not found work in the company that had indicated him because they were already covered all the positions… "
YES HE/SHE WOULD UNDERSTAND THE INTERPRETATION THAT THE RELATIVES OFFER HIM AND THAT IT COULD BE THIS:
"A friend didn't find work"
IT IS THE SAME BUT SUMMARIZED FOR THE DEAF PERSON'S LIMIT.
Those deaf people that have not studied that don't know how to read correctly that ignore words and the composition of the same ones in sentences (thousands and thousands of words) they should accept their limitation and not to confuse this with discrimination.
Many exist more reasons to rebut everything and each one of the complaints that those deaf people formulate…, but it would be completely out if it exposed them here.
DISCRIMINATION DOES NOT EXIST. LIMITATION YES IT EXISTS.
0 comments:
Post a Comment